Cases 1 - 10 of 10
ROYZENSHTEYN et al v. ONYX ENTERPRISES CANADA INC. et al
as 3:2022cv07514
Plaintiff:
STANISLAV ROYZENSHTEYN and ROMAN GERASHENKO
Defendant:
ONYX ENTERPRISES CANADA INC., PRASHANT PATHAK, CAREY KURTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
ABI-HANNA et al v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
as 2:2019cv17837
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL TREZZA, ROSE M. CAMPANARO, HAROLD CAREY and others
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
CAREY v. RUGGERE et al
as 2:2018cv12474
Defendant:
SEAN HARDING, BIOTRANS LLC, XPL WORLDWIDE INC. and others
Plaintiff:
IAN CAREY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCILWAIN v. BERMAN et al
as 1:2017cv01257
Plaintiff:
MCILWAIN, LLC
Defendant:
STEVE W. BERMAN, ESQ, ROBERT B. CAREY, ESQ, LEONARD W. ARAGON, ESQ. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CAREY v. LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE CO.
as 3:2014cv00050
Plaintiff:
MOIRA CAREY
Defendant:
LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE CO.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
PARTCH v. CAREY et al
as 1:2012cv00718
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL PARTCH
Defendant:
WILLIAM V. CAREY, CHRISTOPHER BIEDERMANN, DAVID BAILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HIMMEL v. CAREY et al
as 1:2011cv06935
Plaintiff:
DANIEL HIMMEL
Defendant:
WILLIAM V. CAREY, CHRISTOPHER BIEDERMANN, DAVID BAILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
YEUNG v. CAREY et al
as 1:2011cv06667
Plaintiff:
YING YEUNG
Defendant:
WILLIAM V. CAREY, DAVID BAILEY, N. SCOTT FINE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DEWLAND v. CAREY, DANIS & LOWE et al
as 1:2011cv04442
Plaintiff:
TRACY DEWLAND
Defendant:
CAREY, DANIS & LOWE, JOHN J CAREY, ESQ, DOUGLAS & LONDON, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BIO-REFERENCE LABORATORIES, INC. v. CAREY et al
as 2:2009cv05093
Plaintiff:
BIO-REFERENCE LABORATORIES, INC.
Defendant:
MATT CAREY and SAM RUTA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
