Cases 1 - 8 of 8
A.V. Diamonds Inc. v. Mauberis
as 4:2024cv00823
Plaintiff:
A.V. DIAMONDS INC and A.V. Diamonds Inc.
Defendant:
BERNARDO MAUBERIS and Mauberis & Sons, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Evanston Insurance Company v. Bernardo V. Reyes, III, et al
as 5:2019cv00944
Defendant:
Terramark Interests, L.L.C, Paulo Perez, Terramark Contractors, L.L.C., and others
Counter Plaintiff:
Bernardo V. Reyes, III
Plaintiff:
Evanston Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Diaz v. Wellington Insurance Company
as 5:2015cv00383
Plaintiff:
Bernardo Diaz
Defendant:
Wellington Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Hawk et al v. Pershing LLC
as 3:2015cv00747
Plaintiff:
Tom Hawk , Claude Dumont De Hawk , Guillermo Aceto and others
Defendant:
Pershing LLC
Developers Surety and Indemnity Company v. Benitez Construction, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00562
Defendant:
Bernardo C. Benitez, Erasmo Benitez, Feliciano Benitez and others
Plaintiff:
Developers Surety and Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
United States of America v. Gutierrez et al
as 3:2011cv00169
Defendant:
Christina Barela, CB Underwriting, LLC, Contract Compliance, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act
O'Connor v. Property and Casualty Insurance Company of Hartford et al
as 4:2009cv03220
Plaintiff:
Sandra O'Connor
Defendant:
Property and Casualty Insurance Company of Hartford, Michele Crump and Irene Bernardo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Sanchez v. Property and Casualty Insurance Company of Hartford et al
as 4:2009cv01736
Plaintiff:
Hector Sanchez
Defendant:
Property and Casualty Insurance Company of Hartford and Irene Bernardo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
