Cases 1 - 6 of 6
MEDELY, INC v. IJKG OPCO LLC
as 2:2024cv01074
Defendant:
IJKG OPCO LLC doing business as CAREPOINT HEALTH - BAYONNE MEDICAL CENTER
Plaintiff:
MEDELY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Contract Dispute
TECOGEN, INC. v. HUMC OPCO LLC
as 2:2023cv22113
Plaintiff:
TECOGEN, INC.
Defendant:
HUMC OPCO LLC D/B/A CAREPOINT HEALTH - HOBOKEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER and HUMC OPCO LLC doing business as CAREPOINT HEALTH - HOBOKEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
SYSTEMATECH TECHNICAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. v. CAREPOINT HEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES LLC et al
as 2:2019cv13787
Defendant:
IJKG OPCO LLC, CarePoint Health Management Associates LLC, d/b/a CarePoint Health, HUMC OPCO LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SYSTEMATECH TECHNICAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. D/B/A INDEMAND INTERPRETING, Stratus InDemand, Inc. and SYSTEMATECH TECHNICAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HR STAFFING CONSULTANTS, LLC et al v. BUTTS
as 2:2015cv03155
Plaintiff:
HR STAFFING CONSULTANTS, LLC and UPSTREAM HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT OF NEW JERSEY, LLC
Defendant:
RICHARD BUTTS
Intervenor_defendant:
CarePoint Health Management Associates LLC, d/b/a CarePoint Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
UPSTREAM HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT OF NEW JERSEY, LLC et al v. CAREPOINT HEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv02290
Plaintiff:
UPSTREAM HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT OF NEW JERSEY, LLC and HR STAFFING CONSULTANTS, LLC
Defendant:
CAREPOINT HEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, LLC , PENINSULA WOUND CARE CENTER, LLC and HOBOKEN WOUND CARE CENTER, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CITYSIDE ARCHIVES, LTD. v. HUDSON HOSPITAL OPCO, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv01796
Plaintiff:
CITYSIDE ARCHIVES, LTD.
Defendant:
HUDSON HOSPITAL OPCO, LLC , HUMC OPCO, LLC , HUDSON HOSPITAL HOLDCO, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
