Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Chieftain Royalty Company v. SM Energy Company, et al
as 22-6125
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHIEFTAIN ROYALTY COMPANY, on its behalf and as representative of a class of similarly situated royalty owners
Defendant / Appellee:
SM ENERGY COMPANY, including predecessors, successors and affiliates, ENERVEST ENERGY INSTITUTIONAL FUND XIII-A, L.P., ENERVEST ENERGY INSTITUTIONAL FUND XIII-WIB, L.P. and others
Appellant:
CHARLES DAVID NUTLEY
Other:
DANNY GEORGE
Chieftain Royalty Company v. SM Energy Company, et al
as 22-6124
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHIEFTAIN ROYALTY COMPANY
Defendant / Appellee:
SM ENERGY COMPANY, including predecessors, successors and affiliates, ENERVEST ENERGY INSTITUTIONAL FUND XIII-A, L.P., ENERVEST ENERGY INSTITUTIONAL FUND XIII-WIB, L.P. and others
Other:
CHARLES DAVID NUTLEY
Appellant:
DANNY GEORGE
Chieftain Royalty Company v. SM Energy Company, et al
as 22-6069
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHIEFTAIN ROYALTY COMPANY
Defendant:
SM ENERGY COMPANY, including predecessors, successors and affiliates, ENERVEST ENERGY INSTITUTIONAL FUND XIII-A, L.P., ENERVEST ENERGY INSTITUTIONAL FUND XIII-WIB, L.P. and others
Other:
CHARLES DAVID NUTLEY
Appellant:
DANNY GEORGE
Chieftain Royalty, et al v. Enervest Energy, et al
as 16-6022
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANNY GEORGE, personally and as Executor of the Estate of Beverly Joyce George
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CHIEFTAIN ROYALTY COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee:
ENERVEST ENERGY INSTITUTIONAL FUND XIII-A, L.P., ENERVEST ENERGY INSTITUTIONAL FUND XIII-WIB, L.P., ENERVEST ENERGY INSTITUTIONAL FUND XIII-WIC, L.P. and others
Defendant:
SM ENERGY COMPANY, (including predecessors, successors and affiliates)
Chieftain Royalty Company v. SM Energy Company
as 5:2011cv00177
Not Classified By Court:
Danny George and Charles David Nutley
Defendant:
Enervest Energy Institutional Fund XIII-WIB LP, Enervest Energy Institutional Fund XIII-A LP, Enervest Operating LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Chieftain Royalty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
