Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Shah v. Robinhood Financial LLC
as 3:2023cv00405
Plaintiff:
Maulik Shah, Cesar Gonzalez, Daniel De La Cruz and others
Defendant:
Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC and Robinhood Markets, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Daniels v. Fry et al
as 3:2020cv02226
Defendant:
Jaime Murillo, David Nisleit, Joel Wohlfeil and others
Plaintiff:
Diane Deliah Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
U.S. Specialty Insurance Company v. FRYS ELECTRONICS, INC.
as 5:2020cv02769
Plaintiff:
U.S. Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
FRYS ELECTRONICS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Fry et al v. Jayco, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00793
Plaintiff:
Diane L. Desmond and Robin Fry
Defendant:
Jayco, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Fry et al v. Jayco, Inc.
as 2:2019at00453
Plaintiff:
Diane L. Desmond and Robin Fry
Defendant:
Jayco, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Denovo Medical, Inc. et al v. Biotronik, Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv04195
Plaintiff:
Denovo Medical, Inc. and Ronald Fry
Defendant:
Biotronik, Inc., James Maldonado, Marlou Janssen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Margaret Fry et al v. Dubblee Media Inc.
as 2:2017cv01591
Defendant:
DOES, Dubblee Media Inc. and Kellee Khalil
Plaintiff:
Margaret Fry
Beth Bairnson Stoll et al v. Lon Stone et al
as 8:2016cv01532
Defendant:
Stone, Lon Stone, Rudolph C. Shepard and others
Plaintiff:
Bairnson Stoll, Beth Bairnson Stoll, George Bairnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Phillips 66 Company v. Fry's South Pasadena Investment Inc et al
as 2:2014cv04562
Defendant:
Fry's South Pasadena Investment Inc and Frydoun Sheikhpour
Plaintiff:
Phillips 66 Company
Phoebe Micro, Inc. v. Fry's Electronics, Inc.
as 4:2013cv02337
Plaintiff:
Phoebe Micro, Inc.
Defendant:
Fry's Electronics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
