Cases 1 - 6 of 6
The Travelers Indemnity Company of America et al v. W.S. Newell, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00481
Plaintiff:
The Travelers Indemnity Company of America and Travelers Property Casualty Company of America
Defendant:
W.S. Newell, Inc. , Hoar Construction, LLC and Cypress/Spanish Fort 1, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
U.S. Bank National Association v. The Cooperative District of the City of Spanish Fort-Highway 98 Public Facilities
as 1:2011cv00401
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
Defendant:
The Cooperative District of the City of Spanish Fort-Highway 98 Public Facilities
Intervenor_defendant:
Andrew Bolnick, in his capacity as Receiver for Cypress/Spanish Fort I, L.P. and Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RBC Bank (USA) v. Spanish Fort Manufacturing, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00729
Plaintiff:
RBC Bank (USA) and RBC Bank (USA)
Defendant:
Spanish Fort Manufacturing, Inc., Danny R. Beebe and Emily L. Beebe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Miller et al v. Fort Dearborn Life Insurance Company
as 2:2009cv01921
Plaintiff:
Barry Miller and Frances Miller
Defendant:
Fort Dearborn Life Insurance Company and Fort Dearborn Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Richardson v. Fort Dearborn Life Insurance Co.
as 1:2009cv00451
Plaintiff:
Keith Richardson
Defendant:
Fort Dearborn Life Insurance Co., Fort Dearborn Life Insurance Co. and Fort Dearborn Life Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Anniston-Calhoun County Fort McClellan Development Joint Powers Authority v. Environmental Chemical Corporation
as 1:2008cv00892
Plaintiff:
Anniston-Calhoun County Fort McClellan Development Joint Powers Authority and Anniston-Calhoun County Fort McClellan Development Joint Powers Authority
Defendant:
Environmental Chemical Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
