Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Olanapo v. Governor of the State of California
as 3:2017cv01017
Plaintiff:
Olajide Olanapo
Defendant:
Governor of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Pauma Band of Luiseno Mission v. State of California, et al
as 14-56104
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PAUMA BAND OF LUISENO MISSION INDIANS OF THE PAUMA & YUIMA RESERVATION, AKA Pauma Band of Mission Indians, AKA Pauma Luiseno Band of Misasion Indians
Defendant - Appellant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA GAMBLING CONTROL COMMISSION, an agency of the State of California and EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., as Governor of the State of California
Pauma Band of Luiseno Mission v. State of California, et al
as 14-56105
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUMA BAND OF LUISENO MISSION INDIANS OF THE PAUMA & YUIMA RESERVATION, AKA Pauma Band of Mission Indians, AKA Pauma Luiseno Band of Misasion Indians
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA GAMBLING CONTROL COMMISSION, an agency of the State of California and EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., as Governor of the State of California
San Pasqual Band of Mission In v. State of California, et al
as 10-55858
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SAN PASQUAL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS, a federally recognized Indian Tribe
Defendant - Appellant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA GAMBLING CONTROL COMMISSION, an agency of the State of California and ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, as Governor of the State of California
Pauma Band of Luiseno Mission v. State of California, et al
as 10-55713
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PAUMA BAND OF LUISENO MISSION INDIANS OF THE PAUMA & YUIMA RESERVATION, a federally recognized Indian Tribe, AKA Pauma Luiseno Band of Misasion Indians, AKA Pauma Band of Mission Indians
Defendant - Appellant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA GAMBLING CONTROL COMMISSION, an agency of the State of California and ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, as Governor of the State of California
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
