Contract Cases filed in Georgia
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Hodge v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01475
Plaintiff: Terri Lynn Hodge
Defendant: AT&T Mobility LLC and AT&T, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Amos et al v. Hodge et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00010
Plaintiff: Kim Amos and Jack Amos
Defendant: James C. Hodge and Lisa C. Hodge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity of citizenship
Webb et al v. DoorDash, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00665
Plaintiff: Jamie Webb and Aaron Hodge
Defendant: DoorDash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00538
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
HODGES v. THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 7:2018cv00163
Defendant: PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Plaintiff: BRENDA GAIL HODGES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Type: Contract Insurance
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04807
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
Hodge v. FanDuel, Inc.
as 1:2015cv03950
Plaintiff: Aaron Hodge and Michelle Hodge
Defendant: FanDuel, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hodge v. DraftKings, Inc.
as 1:2015cv03951
Plaintiff: Aaron Hodge and Michelle Hodge
Defendant: DraftKings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
v. Deere & Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2015cv00123
Plaintiff: Deere & Company
Defendant: Hodges Bros. Enterprises, Inc. , James Nathan Hodges and Gavin B. Hodges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Auto Owners Insurance Company v. Upper Chattahoochee Riverkeeper Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv00014
Plaintiff: Auto Owners Insurance Company
Defendant: Upper Chattahoochee Riverkeeper Inc., DD&M Investments LLC and Daniel E Hodge
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?