Contract Cases filed in Oregon
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Zielinski v. Service Employees International Union Local 503 et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00165
Plaintiff: Christopher Zielinski
Defendant: Katy Coba and Service Employees International Union Local 503
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Type: Contract Insurance
de Boer et al v. Day Electric, Inc.
as 1:2019cv01532
Plaintiff: Cascade Pension Trust, National Electrical Benefit Fund, Local 659 Labor Management Cooperation Fund and others
Defendant: Day Electric, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1131
Regional Local Union Nos. 846 and 847, International Association of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental and Reinforcing Iron Workers, AFL-CIO et al v. KCS Construction, LLC
as 3:2017cv01527
Defendant: KCS Construction, LLC
Plaintiff: Regional District Council Retirement Plan and Trust, Regional District Council Training Trust, Regional District Council Vacation Trust Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Type: Contract Insurance
A-Temp Heating & Cooling, Inc. v. Local 290 of the United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry of the United States and Canada
as 3:2014cv01045
Plaintiff: A-Temp Heating & Cooling, Inc.
Defendant: Local 290 of the United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry of the United States and Canada
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
Type: Contract Insurance
Barr et al v. Ross Island Sand & Gravel CO.
as 3:2012cv00683
Plaintiff: Larry Barr, Anthony Barton, Stephen Busch and others
ThirdParty Defendant: General Teamsters Local Union No. 162 Affiliated with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, General Teamsters Local Union No. 162 Affiliated with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Oregon Teamster Employers Trust and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff: Ross Island Sand & Gravel CO. and Ross Island Sand & Gravel CO.
Defendant: Ross Island Sand & Gravel CO.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
Type: Contract Insurance
Plumbers Local No. 137 Pension Fund et al v. Davis et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00633
Defendant: Bradley F. Copeland, Raymond P. Davis, Ronald L. Farnsworth and others
Plaintiff: Laborers' Local #231 Pension Fund and Plumbers Local No. 137 Pension Fund
Interested Party: Umpqua Holdings Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Leistiko v. International Longshore & Warehouse Union/Local 8 et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00604
Defendant: 2008 Labor Relation Officers, 2008 Secretary/Executive Officer, 2009 Labor Relation Officers and others
Plaintiff: Ronald Marcus Leistiko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Montgomery v. AGC-International Union of Operating Engineers Local 701 Pension Trust Fund, Defined Benefit Plan We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv03129
Plaintiff: Maurice Montgomery
Defendant: AGC-International Union of Operating Engineers Local 701 Pension Trust Fund, Defined Benefit Plan and AGC-International Union of Operating Engineers Local 701 Pension Trust Fund, Defined Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Contract None
United Association Union Local No. 290 v. Federal Insurance Company
as 3:2007cv01521
Plaintiff: United Association Union Local No. 290 and United Association Union Local No. 290
Defendant: Federal Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
United Association Union Local No. 290 v. Federal Insurance Company
as 3:2007cv01529
Plaintiff: United Association Union Local No. 290 and United Association Union Local No. 290
Defendant: Federal Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Insurance

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?