Cases 1 - 9 of 9
LUCAS v. SAVANNA INC. et al
as 2:2023cv01386
Plaintiff:
STEVEN LUCAS
Defendant:
SAVANNA INC., STEVE SLOAN, MICHAEL WOLFEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
JUSINO v. FIRST UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2018cv05373
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER and FIRST UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
SURAMA JUSINO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
SLOAN v. LIBERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION
as 2:2015cv01025
Plaintiff:
BRENDA SLOAN
Defendant:
LIBERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
THE BANCORP BANK v. ECKELL, SPARKS, LEVY, AUERBACH, MONTE, RAINER & SLOANE, P.C.
as 2:2014cv04560
Plaintiff:
THE BANCORP BANK
Defendant:
ECKELL, SPARKS, LEVY, AUERBACH, MONTE, RAINER & SLOANE, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NILSON v. SOFTMART, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv03914
Plaintiff:
MARK JAY NILSON
Defendant:
SOFTMART, INC., SOFTMART COMMERICAL SERVICES INC., SOFTMART GOVERNMENT SERVICES INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
SLOAN v. FRASCELLA et al
as 2:2012cv03609
Plaintiff:
STACY SLOAN
Defendant:
LARRY FRASCELLA , DAVID FRASCELLA and LIGHTHOUSE LEGAL FINANCE, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WHITE v. PROVIDENT FUNDING GROUP INC. et al
as 2:2011cv03576
Plaintiff:
CALVIN WHITE
Defendant:
PROVIDENT FUNDING GROUP INC., MICHELLE BLAKE, WELLS FARGO BANK, NA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SLOAN & COMPANY v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2007cv05325
Plaintiff:
SLOAN & COMPANY
Defendant:
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
SLOANE CHEVROLET, INC. v. GENERAL MOTORS CORP.
as 2:2007cv02429
Plaintiff:
SLOANE CHEVROLET, INC.
Defendant:
GENERAL MOTORS CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
