Cases 1 - 7 of 7
BAYSTATE FRANKLIN MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv00822
Plaintiff:
BAYSTATE FRANKLIN MEDICAL CENTER, BAYSTATE NOBLE HOSPITAL, BAYSTATE WING HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
ST. LUKE'S HEALTH NETWORK, INC. et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2021cv00188
Plaintiff:
ST. LUKE'S HEALTH NETWORK, INC. doing business as ST. LUKE'S HOSPITAL, ALBERT EINSTEIN HEALTHCARE NETWORK doing business as ALBERT EINSTEIN MEDICAL CENTER, VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
NORRIS COCHRAN and XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
ANNA JACQUES HOSPITAL et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2013cv00053
Plaintiff:
ANNA JACQUES HOSPITAL , BERKSHIRE MEDICAL CENTER , BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN G. SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
ALEGENT HEALTH - BERGAN MERCY HEALTH SYSTEM et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2010cv01354
Plaintiff:
ALEGENT HEALTH - BERGAN MERCY HEALTH SYSTEM , ALEGENT HEALTH - IMMANUEL MEDICAL CENTER , CARITAS CHRISTI and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
ANNA JAQUES HOSPITAL et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2009cv02390
Plaintiff:
ANNA JAQUES HOSPITAL, BROCKTON HOSPITAL, INC., COOLEY DICKINSON HOSPTIAL, INC. and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
T. CURTIS & COMPANY, P.C. et al v. ENVISION HOSPITAL CORPORATION et al
as 1:2009cv00376
Plaintiff:
T. CURTIS & COMPANY, P.C. and TANYA CURTIS
Defendant:
ENVISION HOSPITAL CORPORATION, GREATER SOUTHEAST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL CORPORATION I and PAUL R. TUFT
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS UNLIMITED, LLC v. TUFT et al
as 1:2008cv02045
Plaintiff:
HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS UNLIMITED, LLC
Defendant:
PAUL R. TUFT and ENVISION HOSPITAL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
