Cases 1 - 5 of 5
SCHLAFLY v. THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2017cv02522
Plaintiff:
ANDREW L. SCHLAFLY
Defendant:
THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY (U.S.A.)
Third_party_defendant:
Eagle Forum, The Phyllis Schlafly Irrevocable Trust, Eunie Smith and others
Third_party_plaintiff:
THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY (U.S.A.)
Counter_claimant:
THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY (U.S.A.)
Counter_defendant:
ANDREW L. SCHLAFLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COMPOSITION ROOFERS LOCAL 4 et al v. EVERETT H. THORNE COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv04252
Plaintiff:
COMPOSITION ROOFERS LOCAL 4 , COMPOSITION ROOFERS LOCAL 4 PENSION FUND , COMPOSITION ROOFERS LOCAL 4 WELFARE FUND and others
Defendant:
EVERETT H. THORNE COMPANY, INC. and Peter Thorne, in his personal capacity as principal of Everett H. Thorne Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
STATIONARY ENGINEERS LOCAL 39 PENSION TRUST FUND v. CARROLL et al
as 2:2012cv00349
Plaintiff:
STATIONARY ENGINEERS LOCAL 39 PENSION TRUST FUND
Defendant:
PHILIP J. CARROLL, JR. , PHILLIP W. FARMER , H. ALLEN FRANKLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MINNEAPOLIS FIREFIGHTERS' RELIEF ASSOCIATION et al v. WELDON et al
as 3:2010cv03215
Plaintiff:
MINNEAPOLIS FIREFIGHTERS' RELIEF ASSOCIATION , NECA-IBEW PENSION TRUST FUND and NECA-IBEW WELFARE TRUST FUND
Defendant:
WILLIAM C. WELDON, MARY SUE COLEMAN, Ph.D., JAMES G. CULLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CANESTRI v. NYSA-ILA PENSION TRUST FUND AND PLAN
as 2:2007cv01603
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA CANESTRI
Defendant:
NYSA-ILA PENSION TRUST FUND AND PLAN and NYSA-ILA PENSION TRUST FUND AND PLAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
