Cases 1 - 8 of 8
YI-CHENG PRODUCTS CO., LTD. v. SNOW JOE LLC
as 2:2024cv00807
Plaintiff:
YI-CHENG PRODUCTS CO., LTD.
Defendant:
SNOW JOE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
DAYS INNS WORLDWIDE, INC. v. GOLDEN TREASURY II et al
as 2:2020cv05995
Plaintiff:
DAYS INNS WORLDWIDE, INC.
Defendant:
GOLDEN TREASURY II, CHONG S. YI and MARGARET YI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SENTINEL INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. v. H&K SERVICES, INC. et al
as 3:2017cv02062
Plaintiff:
SENTINEL INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD.
Defendant:
H&K SERVICES, INC., ZHONG YI DING, KANSAS SQUARED, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAYS INNS WORLDWIDE, INC. v. YI
as 2:2016cv04547
Plaintiff:
DAYS INNS WORLDWIDE, INC.
Defendant:
KWI SOON YI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
TONGLU RISING SUN SHOES CO., LTD v. NATURAL NINE (USA) CO., LTD. et al
as 2:2014cv01634
Plaintiff:
TONGLU RISING SUN SHOES CO., LTD
Defendant:
NATURAL NINE (USA) CO., LTD. , YI XIAN JIANG , ZHAO HUI HUANG and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
ZHAO HUI HUANG , YI XIAN JIANG and NATURAL NINE (USA) CO., LTD.
Thirdparty_defendant:
Xiaosha ZHAO and Guolei TONG
Counter_claimant:
ZHAO HUI HUANG , YI XIAN JIANG and NATURAL NINE (USA) CO., LTD.
Counter_defendant:
TONGLU RISING SUN SHOES CO., LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KIM v. YI
as 2:2013cv07065
Plaintiff:
KI KIM
Defendant:
SUNG KUN YI
Counter_claimant:
SUNG KUN YI
Counter_defendant:
KI KIM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CAMBRIDGE EDUCATIONAL CENTER, INC. v. YI et al
as 2:2011cv07140
Plaintiff:
CAMBRIDGE EDUCATIONAL CENTER, INC.
Defendant:
SON HWA YI and UNITED YOUNG ARTIST FOUNDATION INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PARK et al v. YI et al
as 2:2007cv05574
Plaintiff:
SOON JUNG PARK, TAE JUN PARK and CHEOL S. SON
Defendant:
CHONG TAE YI, HYE KYUNG YI, CHONG UP YI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
