Cases 101 - 110 of 153
Deckers Outdoor Corporation v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2017cv00173
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Yu Xia, Zoe Quilter and others
Plaintiff:
Deckers Outdoor Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
NBA Properties, Inc. et al v. Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", The et al
as 1:2016cv11117
Plaintiff:
NBA Properties, Inc, NBA Properties, Inc., MLB Advanced Media, L.P. and others
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", The, Yan Zhou and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Ideavillage Products Corp. v. Bling Boutique Store, et al.
as 1:2016cv09039
Plaintiff:
Ideavillage Products Corp.
Defendant:
Bling Boutique Store, Corporate, Dongguan Welkong Sports Industrial Co., Ltd. and others
Cross_claimant:
Jiaxing Yu Zhu Textile Co., Ltd. , Dongguan Welkong Sports Industrial Co., Ltd. , Yiwu ZD Household Items Factory and others
Cross_defendant:
Jiaxing Yu Zhu Textile Co., Ltd. , Dongguan Welkong Sports Industrial Co., Ltd. , Yiwu ZD Household Items Factory and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1501
Luxottica Group S.p.A. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2016cv10720
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group S.p.A. and Oakley, Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Zhang Li, Zhao Yuying and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
MLB Advanced Media, L.P. et al v. Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", The
as 1:2016cv10027
Plaintiff:
MLB Advanced Media, L.P. and Major League Baseball Properties, Inc.
Defendant:
Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A" , The, Zou Sen, Zhao Si and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Realty World, Inc. v. NextHome, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv05761
Defendant:
NextHome, Inc, NextHome, Inc. and James Dwiggins
Plaintiff:
Realty World, Inc.
Counter Defendant:
Ying Tack Wong, Andrew Cimerman, Next Home International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Luxottica Group S.p.A. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2016cv07667
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Zhang Ziyi, Yiyi Zhang and others
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group S.p.A, Luxottica Group S.p.A. and Oakley, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Luxottica Group S.p.A. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2016cv07254
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", cui quanjian, Chen Jun and others
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group S.p.A, Luxottica Group S.p.A. and Oakley, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Luxottica Group S.p.A. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2016cv06468
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", customerfirst2015, to-the-better and others
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group S.p.A, Luxottica Group S.p.A. and Oakley, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Luxottica Group S.p.A. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2016cv06073
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Frontini Simone, fu fanjie and others
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group S.p.A, Luxottica Group S.p.A. and Oakley, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
