Cases 101 - 110 of 121
JAPAN TOBACCO, INC. v. KAPPOS
as 1:2010cv01023
Defendant:
DAVID J. KAPPOS
Plaintiff:
JAPAN TOBACCO, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
MAGNACHEM INTERNATIONAL LABORATORIES, INC. v. KAPPOS
as 1:2010cv00892
Plaintiff:
MAGNACHEM INTERNATIONAL LABORATORIES, INC.
Defendant:
DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
KINAXIS HOLDINGS INC. v. KAPPOS
as 1:2010cv00620
Plaintiff:
KINAXIS HOLDINGS INC.
Defendant:
DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
TEPHA, INC., v. KAPPOS
as 1:2010cv00580
Plaintiff:
TEPHA, INC.,
Defendant:
DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
CUMMINS-ALLISON CORPORATION v. THE HONORABLE DAVID J. KAPPOS
as 1:2010cv00567
Plaintiff:
CUMMINS-ALLISON CORPORATION
Defendant:
THE HONORABLE DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183
Michael Kroll v. David Kappos, et al
as 10-5070
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael I. Kroll, Patent Attorney
Defendant - Appellee:
David J. Kappos, in his Official Capacity as Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and Harry I. Moatz, in his Official Capacity as Director of the Office of Enrollment and Discipline of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
MERCK SERONO S.A. v. KAPPOS
as 1:2010cv00348
Plaintiff:
MERCK SERONO S.A.
Defendant:
DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Schmirler v. Kappos
as 2:2010cv00144
Plaintiff:
Dennis L Schmirler and Dennis L Schmirler
Defendant:
David J Kappos
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
MARKEM-IMAJE CORPORATION v. KAPPOS
as 1:2010cv00269
Plaintiff:
MARKEM-IMAJE CORPORATION
Defendant:
DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
CEPHALON, INC. v. KAPPOS
as 1:2010cv00235
Plaintiff:
CEPHALON, INC.
Defendant:
DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
