Intellectual Property Cases filed in Washington
Cases 11 - 20 of 22
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2013cv00550
Plaintiff: Microsoft Corporation
Defendant: 4th Dimension Technology, Inc. and Daniel Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Microsoft Corporation v. 4th Dimension Technology, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv05234
Plaintiff: Microsoft Corporation
Defendant: 4th Dimension Technology, Inc. and Daniel Phillips
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Microsoft Corporation v. Seattle Laptop Incorporated et al
as 2:2012cv02023
Plaintiff: Microsoft Corporation
Defendant: Seattle Laptop Incorporated and Daniel Wagoner
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Winn v. US Government
as 2:2012cv00266
Plaintiff: Daniel P Winn
Defendant: US Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lones Group, Inc. v. Rothamel et al
as 2:2011cv00310
Plaintiff: Lones Group, Inc.
Defendant: Daniel Rothamel and Strong Group Realtors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
NOT USED
as 2:2011cv00308
Plaintiff: The Lones Group, Inc.
Defendant: Daniel Rothamel and Strong Team Realtors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Eden Foods, Inc. et al v. Eden's Organics, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv02055
Plaintiff: Eden Foods, Inc.
Defendant: Eden's Organics, LLC and Daniel Piecora , Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Microsoft Corporation v. Hines et al
as 2:2008cv01750
Plaintiff: Microsoft Corporation and Microsoft Corporation
Defendant: Daniel Hines and John Does
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
eNom Inc v. Philbrick et al
as 2:2008cv01288
Plaintiff: eNom Inc and eNom Inc
Defendant: Daniel J Philbrick and Dover Sports Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Microsoft Corporation v. Huynh et al
as 2:2007cv01952
Plaintiff: Microsoft Corporation and Microsoft Corporation
Defendant: Daniel Huynh, Michael Wong and John Does
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?