Cases 11 - 20 of 125
Phillips v. TraxNYC Corp.
as 1:2021cv00528
Plaintiff:
Maury Lee Phillips
Defendant:
TraxNYC Corp.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Borthwick v. RareCulture, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv01973
Defendant:
Marco Beach Hotel, Inc., EOA, Inc., Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Lee Borthwick
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Minafo v. Lee & Associates NYC LLC
as 1:2020cv01174
Plaintiff:
Christopher Minafo
Defendant:
Lee & Associates NYC LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Stone v. Grande et al
as 1:2020cv00441
Defendant:
Njomza Vitia, Concord Music Group, Inc., Thomas Lee Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Josh Stone
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Lee v. Moncler USA, Inc.
as 1:2019cv11230
Defendant:
Moncler USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jackson Lee
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Indie Lee & Co., Inc. v. Cocoon Apothecary, Inc.
as 1:2019cv11210
Plaintiff:
Indie Lee & Co., Inc.
Defendant:
Cocoon Apothecary, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 tr
Pado, Inc. v. SG Trademark Holding Co LLC et al
as 1:2019cv06614
Defendant:
Herschel Friedman, SG Trademark Holding Co LLC and Coy West
Plaintiff:
Pado, Inc.
Counter Defendant:
Steven Lee
Counter Claimant:
Wieder and Friedman Enterprises Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. ROKDOK LLC et al
as 1:2019cv01302
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc., Paul Simon Music, R-Key Darkus Publishing and others
Defendant:
ROKDOK LLC, Robert O'Keefe, Dawn O'Keefe and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Lee et al v. Hill et al
as 1:2019cv09220
Defendant:
Does 1-10, Belcalis Marlenis Almanzar, Russell James Chell, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee and Glen Keith DeMeritt, III
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. v. APR57.COM, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv07514
Defendant:
Lee Rosenbloom and APR57.COM, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
