Cases 201 - 210 of 4,876
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 2:2023cv11836
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Patagonia, Inc. v. Mylocker.com, LLC
as 2:2023cv11559
Plaintiff:
Patagonia, Inc.
Defendant:
Mylocker.com, L.L.C. and Mylocker.com, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 2:2023cv11840
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
WirelessWerx IP, LLC v. OnStar, LLC
as 2:2023cv11501
Plaintiff:
WirelessWerx IP, LLC
Defendant:
OnStar, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 2:2023cv11837
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 2:2023cv11839
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Difr-Tek Digital, LLC v. Progressive Components International Corporation
as 2:2023cv11581
Plaintiff:
Difr-Tek Digital, LLC
Defendant:
Progressive Components International Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
GS Holistic, LLC v. 10 Mile Smoke Shop, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv11890
Plaintiff:
GS Holistic, LLC
Defendant:
10 Mile Smoke Shop, LLC dba 10 Mile Smoke Shop, Ali Nawfan and 10 Mile Smoke Shop, LLC Doing business as 10 Mile Smoke Shop
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
Galaxy Foods LLC v. Aryz Trading LLC
as 2:2023cv11476
Plaintiff:
GALAXY FOODS LLC
Defendant:
ARYZ TRADING LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 2:2023cv11841
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
