Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Brooks v. Dunlop Manufacturing, Inc.
as 3:2010cv04341
Plaintiff:
Kenneth C. Brooks
Defendant:
Dunlop Manufacturing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Hitek Software LLC v. United Surgical Partners International, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv06832
Defendant:
P. L. Block, J. A. Brooks, B. R. Cole and others
Plaintiff:
Hitek Software LLC
Brooks v. Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Company, The
as 4:2010cv04089
Plaintiff:
Kenneth C. Brooks
Defendant:
Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Company, The
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
M.D. Manufacturing, Inc. v. Think Vacuums, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv02770
Plaintiff:
M.D. Manufacturing, Inc.
Defendant:
Think Vacuums, Inc., Think Vacuums, Inc., Think Vacuums, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Adams & Brooks, Inc. v. Bee International, Inc.
as 3:2009cv00727
Plaintiff:
Adams & Brooks, Inc.
Defendant:
Bee International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brooks v. BET Networks et al
as 3:2009cv00634
Plaintiff:
Fran S. Brooks
Defendant:
BET Networks, 3 Arts Entertainment, Inc. and Franzke Entertainment, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Adobe Systems Incorporated v. Brooks et al
as 5:2008cv04044
Plaintiff:
Adobe Systems Incorporated and Adobe Systems Incorporated
Defendant:
Jeffrey Brooks and MSM, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Adobe Systems Incorporated v. Brooks et al
as 3:2008cv04044
Plaintiff:
Adobe Systems Incorporated and Adobe Systems Incorporated
Defendant:
Jeffrey Brooks and MSM, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Coach Services, Inc. v. Ki's Clothing et al
as 3:2008cv03163
Plaintiff:
Coach Services, Inc. and Coach Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Ki's Clothing and Neikiath Brooks
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Nike Inc v. Anthony Brooks et al
as 2:2007cv02691
Plaintiff:
Nike Inc and Nike Inc
Defendant:
Anthony Brooks and DOES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
