Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Big Daddy Games v. Reel Spin Studios LLC et al
as 1:2012cv00475
Plaintiff:
Big Daddy Games
Defendant:
Reel Spin Studios LLC , Game Management Corporation , James L Donker and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Carrier Corporation v. Kaiver
as 1:2011cv00957
Plaintiff:
Carrier Corporation
Defendant:
David Kaiver
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Rubenzer, Ray v. Melgaard, David et al
as 3:2011cv00445
Plaintiff:
Ray Rubenzer
Defendant:
David Melgaard and Lois Melgaard
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Rubenzer, Ray v. Melgaard, David et al
as 3:2011cv00410
Plaintiff:
Ray Rubenzer
Defendant:
David Melgaard and Lois Melgaard
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
EMI April Music, Inc. et al v. Regner Hotel Corp. et al
as 3:2011cv00029
Plaintiff:
EMI April Music, Inc. , Getarealjob Music , New Don Songs and others
Defendant:
Regner Hotel Corp. , David Regner and Marjorie Regner
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
City of La Crosse v. Montealegre, David
as 3:2010cv00480
Plaintiff:
City of La Crosse
Defendant:
David Alberto Montealegre
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Schmirler v. Kappos
as 2:2010cv00144
Plaintiff:
Dennis L Schmirler and Dennis L Schmirler
Defendant:
David J Kappos
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Warner Bros Inc et al v. Menasha Grill Inc et al
as 1:2009cv00768
Plaintiff:
Warner Bros Inc, Warner Bros Inc, Warner Bros Inc and others
Defendant:
Menasha Grill Inc, Charlie Cross and Marti Cross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
David & Goliath Builders Inc v. Kramer et al
as 2:2009cv00621
Plaintiff:
David & Goliath Builders Inc
Defendant:
Anthony Kramer and Cindy Kramer
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
David & Goliath Builders Inc v. Spiegelhoff
as 2:2009cv00622
Plaintiff:
David & Goliath Builders Inc
Defendant:
Ron Spiegelhoff
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
