Cases 41 - 44 of 44
MacKay v. Crews
as 10-314
Plaintiff:
Reform Party of the United States of America, RPUSA
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant:
John Blare, RPUSA Secretary & RPUSA RPCA National Committee Member & Reform Party of California Chair
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant:
Frank MacKay, Independence Party of New York,, IPNY and Michael K. Zumbluskas, RPUSA IPNY National Committee Member & RPUSA Legal Committee Chair
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
Beverly Bev Kennedy
Defendant:
Karan Kumar Kalotee
Defendant - Appellee:
Kay Allison Crews, Charles Foster, David Collison and others
Intervenor - Appellant:
Shawn O'Hara
MacKay v. Crews
as 10-293
Plaintiff:
Reform Party of the United States of America, RPUSA
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant:
John Blare, RPUSA Secretary & RPUSA RPCA National Committee Member & Reform Party of California Chair
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant:
Frank MacKay, Independence Party of New York,, IPNY and Michael K. Zumbluskas, RPUSA IPNY National Committee Member & RPUSA Legal Committee Chair
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
Beverly Bev Kennedy
Defendant:
Karan Kumar Kalotee
Defendant - Appellee:
Kay Allison Crews, Charles Foster, David Collison and others
Intervenor - Appellant:
Shawn O'Hara
Santibanez v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2009cv61695
Plaintiff:
Victorino Santibanez
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cornell Cornish v. Jon Dudas, et al
as 08-5089
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Cornell D.M. Judge Cornish
Defendant - Appellee:
Jon W. Dudas, in his Official Capacity as Under-Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Harry I. Moatz, in his Official Capacity as Director, Office of Enrollment and Discipline, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
