Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 74
Malem Medical, Ltd., et al v. Theos Medical Systems, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-17289
Plaintiff - Appellee: MALEM MEDICAL, LTD., a United Kingdom corporation and ENURESIS ASSOCIATES, LLC, a Maryland limited liability company
Defendant - Appellant: THEOS MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. and SAKET BHATIA
Burberry Limited, a United Kingdom company et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2017cv07171
Plaintiff: Burberry Limited, a United Kingdom company and Burberry Limited, a New York corporation
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", zheng ru ping, zou yulan and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Kroma Makeup EU, LLC v. Boldface Licensing + Branding,, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-14211
Plaintiff - Appellant: KROMA MAKEUP EU, LLC, a United Kingdom Limited Liability Company
Defendant - Appellee: BOLDFACE LICENSING + BRANDING, INC., a Nevada Corporation, KIMBERLY KARDASHIAN, a California resident, KOURTNEY KARDASHIAN, a California Resident and others
Malem Medical, Ltd., et al v. Theos Medical Systems, Inc., et al
as 17-16818
Plaintiff - Appellee: MALEM MEDICAL, LTD., a United Kingdom corporation and ENURESIS ASSOCIATES, LLC, a Maryland limited liability company
Defendant - Appellant: THEOS MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. and SAKET BHATIA
Burberry Limited et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2017cv05123
Plaintiff: Burberry Limited, a United Kingdom company and Burberry Limited, a New York corporation
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A" and Xie Lilan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Pinkette Clothing, Inc. v. Cosmetic Warriors Limited We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-55325
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellee: PINKETTE CLOTHING, INC., a California corporation
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellant: COSMETIC WARRIORS LIMITED, believed to be a United Kingdom limited company doing business as Lush Handmade Cosmetics
Burberry Limited, a United Kingdom company et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2017cv00702
Plaintiff: Burberry Limited, a United Kingdom company and Burberry Limited, a New York corporation
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Zhang Lianyou and inalliance0009
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Burberry Limited, a United Kingdom company et al v. Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", The
as 1:2016cv09947
Plaintiff: Burberry Limited, a United Kingdom company and Burberry Limited, a New York corporation
Defendant: Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", The, Bixiang Lin, Bixiang Lin (2) and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Glassey et al v. The United Kingdom et.al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv05606
Plaintiff: Todd S. Glassey and Michael E McNeil
Defendant: The Nation of Australia, The Dominion of Canada, The Republic of South Africa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Burberry Limited, a United Kingdom company et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2016cv07635
Plaintiff: Burberry Limited, a United Kingdom company and Burberry Limited, a New York corporation
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Mi Zhang, burberryuk.eu and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?