Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Fricker's Progressive Concepts, Inc v. Frick Investments, LLC
as 2:2023cv13149
Plaintiff:
Fricker's Progressive Concepts, Inc., d/b/a/ Fricker's and Fricker's Progressive Concepts, Inc Doing business as Fricker's
Defendant:
Frick Investments, LLC d/b/a Frick'N Good Cookies and Frick Investments, LLC Doing business as Frick'N Good Cookies
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Albert v. Cathy's Concepts, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv12167
Plaintiff:
Kelly M. Albert
Defendant:
Cathy's Concepts, Inc. and Cathy La Valley
Visual Interactive Phone Concepts, Inc. v. AT&T Mobility, LLC
as 2:2011cv13106
Plaintiff:
Visual Interactive Phone Concepts, Inc.
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Visual Interactive Phone Concepts, Inc. v. Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC
as 2:2011cv12945
Plaintiff:
Visual Interactive Phone Concepts, Inc.
Defendant:
Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Visual Interactive Phone Concepts, Inc. v. Cellco Partnership
as 2:2011cv12349
Plaintiff:
Visual Interactive Phone Concepts, Inc.
Defendant:
Cellco Partnership
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Visual Interactive Phone Concepts, Inc. v. Google, Inc.
as 2:2011cv12348
Plaintiff:
Visual Interactive Phone Concepts, Inc.
Defendant:
Google, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Visual Interactive Phone Concepts, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.
as 2:2011cv12310
Plaintiff:
Visual Interactive Phone Concepts, Inc.
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Visual Interactive Phone Concepts, Inc. v. AT&T, Inc.
as 2:2011cv12303
Plaintiff:
Visual Interactive Phone Concepts, Inc.
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Visual Interactive Phone Concepts, Inc. v. United States Cellular Corporation
as 2:2011cv12313
Plaintiff:
Visual Interactive Phone Concepts, Inc.
Defendant:
United States Cellular Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
