Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Amy R. Weissbrod v. Live Nation Entertainment Inc.
as 2:2023cv04381
Plaintiff:
Amy R. Weissbrod
Defendant:
Live Nation Entertainment Inc., Ticketmaster, Inc., Live Nation, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Garcoa, Inc. v. Sierra Sage Herbs LLC
as 2:2021cv04672
Plaintiff:
Garcoa, Inc.
Defendant:
Does I-X, Inclusive and Sierra Sage Herbs LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Tatsu Ramen, LLC v. Sky Pyramid, Inc. dba Tatsu Ramen Hlouse
as 2:2021cv04334
Plaintiff:
Tatsu Ramen, LLC
Defendant:
Sky Pyramid, Inc. dba Tatsu Ramen Hlouse, Sky Pyramid, Inc. an Illinois corporation doing business as Tatsu Ramen House and Does I-X, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Garcoa Inc v. Nature's Beauty Mix, LLC, et al
as 2:2020cv10903
Plaintiff:
Garcoa Inc
Defendant:
Nature's Beauty Mix, LLC and Does I-X, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Garcoa, Inc. v. Natures Beauty NZ Ltd.
as 2:2020cv10756
Plaintiff:
Garcoa, Inc.
Defendant:
Nature's Beauty (NZ) Ltd., Does I-X, Inclusive and Natures Beauty NZ Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Garcoa, Inc. v. All Clean Natural Ltd., et al
as 2:2020cv09827
Plaintiff:
Garcoa, Inc.
Defendant:
All Clean Natural Ltd. and Does I - X, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Vitamin Classics, Inc. v. Nova 3 Labs LP
as 2:2020cv05419
Plaintiff:
Vitamin Classics, Inc.
Defendant:
Does I-X, inclusive, Nova 3 Labs LP, Does II-X, inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Tatsu Ramen LLC v. Ryu Ramen LLC et al
as 2:2020cv00896
Defendant:
Ryu Ramen LLC and Does I-X, Inclusive
Plaintiff:
Tatsu Ramen LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Murad Inc v. Sarkli-Repechage Ltd et al
as 2:2012cv00813
Plaintiff:
Murad Inc
Defendant:
Sarkli-Repechage Ltd and Does I-X Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Sun-Mate Corporation v. Office Depot, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv01906
Defendant:
Does I-X and Office Depot, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sun-Mate Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
