Cases 1 - 10 of 19
West Coast Imports, Inc. v. Emson, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08537
Counter Defendant:
West Coast Imports, Inc.
Defendant:
Emson, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
E. Mishan & Sons, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
E. Mishan & Sons, Inc. et al v. RSA Group, LLC
as 1:2020cv07523
Defendant:
RSA Group, LLC doing business as As Seen on TV Pros
Plaintiff:
E. Mishan & Sons, Inc. and BHH LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Spin Master, Ltd. v. E. Mishan & Sons, Inc.
as 1:2019cv09035
Plaintiff:
Spin Master, Ltd.
Defendant:
E. Mishan & Sons, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0001
Araujo v. E. Mishan & Sons, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv05785
Defendant:
ABC Corporation 1 through 10, EMSON USA, Robin Roe 1 through 10 and others
Plaintiff:
Araujo William and William Araujo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Oakley, Inc. v. E. Mishan & Sons, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00822
Plaintiff:
Oakley, Inc.
Defendant:
E. Mishan & Sons, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
E. Mishan & Sons, Inc. v. Telebrands Corp.
as 1:2016cv06918
Plaintiff:
E. Mishan & Sons, Inc.
Defendant:
Telebrands Corp.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Avenue Innovations Inc. v. E. Mishan & Sons Inc.
as 1:2016cv03086
Plaintiff:
Avenue Innovations Inc.
Defendant:
E. Mishan & Sons Inc
Counter_claimant:
E. Mishan & Sons Inc
Counter_defendant:
Avenue Innovations Inc.
Mediator:
David Folsom
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
BHH LLC et al v. Kenu, Inc.
as 1:2014cv07265
Plaintiff:
BHH LLC and E. Mishan & Sons, Inc.
Defendant:
Kenu, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Emerson Radio Corp. v. E. Mishan & Sons, Inc.
as 1:2012cv08538
Plaintiff:
Emerson Radio Corp.
Defendant:
E. Mishan & Sons, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Hair Flair Limited et al v. E. Mishan & Sons, Inc.
as 1:2011cv00523
Plaintiff:
Hair Flair Limited and Telebrands Corp.
Defendant:
E. Mishan & Sons, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
