Cases 1 - 10 of 16
With-U E-Commerce Shanghai Co., Ltd. v. Global Shade Corporation et al
as 8:2022cv01295
Plaintiff:
With-U E-Commerce (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. and With-U E-Commerce Shanghai Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
Global Shade Corporation, Wal-Mart.com USA, LLC, WalMart Fulfillment Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00462
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Yanyang Luo v. Zhu Jian Guo
as 2:2021cv00189
Plaintiff:
YANYANG LUO and Bill Luo
Defendant:
Zhu Jian Guo
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
With-U E-Commerce (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. v. Global Shade Corporation et al
as 8:2020cv00917
Defendant:
Does 1-10, Global Shade Corporation and Jian He
Plaintiff:
With-U E-Commerce (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Drop Stop LLC v. Jian Qing Zhu et al
as 2:2016cv07916
Defendant:
3BTech, Inc., Shenzen Zhouwu Technology Co., Ltd., Zake International Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Drop Stop LLC
Cree, Inc. v. Flyt E-Commerce Services Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv05208
Plaintiff:
Cree, Inc.
Defendant:
Does, Five Star Store Inc., Flyt E-Commerce Services Inc. and others
Cirana Corporation v. Changshu Jicheng Spinning and Weaving Commodities Co Ltd et al
as 2:2016cv04590
Defendant:
Changshu Jicheng Spinning and Weaving Commodities Co Ltd., Jian Ming Chen, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Cirana Corporation
Sky Billiards, Inc. v. EVERYDAYLUCKY et al
as 5:2015cv00436
Defendant:
Does, EVERYDAYLUCKY, X3MM, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Sky Billiards, Inc.
Coach, Inc. et al v. G & C USA Trading, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00168
Plaintiff:
Coach Services, Inc. and Coach, Inc.
Defendant:
Does, G & C USA Trading, Inc. and Jian Cong Huang
Surefire, LLC v. Powertac et al
as 3:2013cv00832
Plaintiff:
SureFire, LLC
Defendant:
Powertac and Jian Li
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
