Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Roger McIntosh v. Northern California Universal, et al
as 11-15665
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROGER MCINTOSH, DBA McIntosh and Associates
Defendant - Appellant:
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA UNIVERSAL ENTERPRISES COMPANY, a California corporation and LOTUS DEVELOPMENTS, LLP
Defendant:
CITY OF WASCO, a municipal corporation and DENNIS W. DE WALT, INC., AKA DeWalt Corporation
Roger McIntosh v. Northern California Universal, et al
as 10-17006
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROGER MCINTOSH, DBA McIntosh and Associates
Defendant - Appellant:
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA UNIVERSAL ENTERPRISES COMPANY, a California corporation and LOTUS DEVELOPMENTS, LLP
Defendant:
CITY OF WASCO, a municipal corporation and DENNIS W. DE WALT, INC., AKA DeWalt Corporation
Roger McIntosh v. Northern California Universal, et al
as 10-16981
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER MCINTOSH, DBA McIntosh and Associates
Defendant - Appellee:
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA UNIVERSAL ENTERPRISES COMPANY, a California corporation and LOTUS DEVELOPMENTS, LLP
Defendant:
CITY OF WASCO, a municipal corporation and DENNIS W. DE WALT, INC., AKA DeWalt Corporation
Roger McIntosh v. City of Wasco, et al
as 10-15999
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF WASCO, a municipal corporation
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROGER MCINTOSH, DBA McIntosh and Associates
Defendant:
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA UNIVERSAL ENTERPRISES COMPANY, a California corporation, LOTUS DEVELOPMENTS, LLP and DENNIS W. DE WALT, INC., AKA DeWalt Corporation
McIntosh v. Nothern California Universal Enterprises Company et al
as 1:2007at00363
Plaintiff:
Roger McIntosh
Defendant:
Nothern California Universal Enterprises Company, Lotus Developments LP and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
McIntosh v. Nothern California Universal Enterprises Company et al
as 1:2007cv01080
Plaintiff:
Roger McIntosh
Defendant:
Nothern California Universal Enterprises Company and Lotus Developments, LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
