Cases 1 - 10 of 14
E. Mishan & Sons, Inc. v. Mark Feldstein & Associates, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
E. Mishan & Sons, Inc.
Defendant:
Mark Feldstein & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
GS Holistic, LLC v. M.W. & Sons, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00294
Plaintiff:
GS HOLISTIC, LLC
Defendant:
M.W. & SONS, INC, MAHMOUD WAHDAN, MANEER WAHDAN and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Slave Legacy LLC v. Son of SLAVE, et al
as 3:2023cv00152
Plaintiff:
Slave Legacy LLC
Defendant:
Son of SLAVE and Mark LaQuan Akridge
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Kramer v. Dadant & Sons, Inc.
as 5:2022cv01736
Plaintiff:
Jeannette Marie Kramer
Defendant:
Dadant & Sons, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Campinha-Bacote v. Wolters Kluwer United States Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00151
Defendant:
ASSOCIATION OF WOMENS HEALTH, OBSTETRIC AND NEONATAL NURSES, Patricia A. Creehan, Cynthia Rudy and others
Plaintiff:
Josepha A. Campinha-Bacote
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Voigt v. Mongiovi & Son Enterprise, Inc.
as 3:2019cv00254
Defendant:
Mongiovi & Son Enterprise, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Amy E Voigt
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Nock and Son Company v. NCI, Inc.
as 1:2012cv01927
Plaintiff:
Nock and Son Company
Defendant:
NCI, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Clean Wood Recycling, Inc. v. Harold Tatman and Sons Enterprises, Inc.
as 3:2011cv01008
Plaintiff:
Clean Wood Recycling, Inc.
Defendant:
Harold Tatman and Sons Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Filing Error
as 3:2011cv01005
Plaintiff:
Clean Wood Recycling, Inc.
Defendant:
Harold Tatman and Sons Enterprises, Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Buckeye Ford Mercury, Inc. v. Longgreen LLC et al
as 2:2010cv00557
Defendant:
Longgreen LLC, David D. Long, Green & Sons, Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Buckeye Ford Mercury, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
