Cases 91 - 100 of 35,885
Zachary Glaze et al Martin O'Malley et al.
as 2:2024cv03592
Petitioner:
Zachary Glaze and Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Amanda M. Stoican v. Martin O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00922
Plaintiff:
Amanda M. Stoican
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
David Kotaro Nishizawa v. Martin O'Malley
as 2:2024cv03575
Plaintiff:
David Kotaro Nishizawa
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Nikhil Chander Narang v. Martin O'Malley
as 8:2024cv00928
Plaintiff:
Nikhil Chander Narang
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hoang v. Commissioner of SSA Martin O'Malley
as 5:2024cv02564
Plaintiff:
Ha T. Hoang
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Martin O'Malley and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
(SS) Millner v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
Brian Adrian Millner
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
(SS) Lamar v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00504
Plaintiff:
Jacob David Lamar
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Coleene P. C. v. Martin O'Malley
as 2:2024cv03458
Plaintiff:
Coleen P. C.
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lamar v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024at00349
Plaintiff:
Jacob David Lamar
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Denise Carroll v. Martin OMalley
as 2:2024cv03410
Plaintiff:
Denise Carroll
Defendant:
Martin OMalley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
