Cases 131 - 140 of 35,885
(SS) Kieffer v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00490
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Alan Kieffer
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Noe Valdez v. Martin OMalley
as 2:2024cv03339
Plaintiff:
Noe Valdez
Defendant:
Martin OMalley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Dick v. Commissioner of Social Secuity
as 4:2024cv01142
Plaintiff:
Brenda Louise Dick
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Secuity and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Dacones v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00727
Plaintiff:
Gidget Verna Dacones
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7405 IRS: Action for recovery of refunds erroneously made
Sims v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00730
Plaintiff:
Ray P. Sims
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7405 IRS: Action for recovery of refunds erroneously made
Menzel v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv02400
Plaintiff:
Erik Menzel
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Secuity
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Oreginal M. Carr v. Martin O Malley
as 2:2024cv03365
Plaintiff:
Oreginal M. Carr
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Mike Bowman v. Martin J. O Malley
as 5:2024cv00858
Plaintiff:
Mike Bowman
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Claudia Marian Sharp v. Martin O Malley
as 5:2024cv00862
Plaintiff:
Claudia Marian Sharp
Defendant:
Martin O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Matthew Elliott Lindsay v. Martin J. OMalleySecurity
as 8:2024cv00530
Plaintiff:
Matthew Elliott Lindsay
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security and Martin J. OMalley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
