Cases 11 - 20 of 50
Diaz-Molini et al v. Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service
as 3:2015cv03095
Plaintiff:
Hugo Diaz-Molini and Mildred J. Diaz-Molini
Defendant:
Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
Ortiz-Torres v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2015cv01807
Plaintiff:
Felix J. Ortiz-Torres
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Sanchez-Velazquez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2014cv01723
Plaintiff:
Angel J. Sanchez-Velazquez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Diaz v. Astrue
as 3:2014cv01499
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Diaz
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Abreu v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
as 3:2014cv01387
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security, US Attorney General and US Attorney General for the District of Puerto Rico
Plaintiff:
Carlos J. Abreu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Arche_Gonzalez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2013cv01899
Plaintiff:
Mario J. Arche-Gonzalez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Gonzalez-Cordero v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
as 3:2013cv01855
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Lellany Gonzalez-Cordero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ferrer-Velez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2013cv01567
Plaintiff:
Alejandro J. Ferrer-Velez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Moreno-Lagares v. Astrue
as 3:2013cv01257
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Nestor Luis Moreno-Lagares
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Toro-Velez v. Astrue
as 3:2013cv01155
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Plaintiff:
Jorge A. Toro-Velez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
