Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Cornell v. Berryhill, in her capacity as Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 2:2019cv00104
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill, in her capacity as Commissioner, Social Security Administration and Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
David J. Cornell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Reveles v. Berryhill
as 2:2019cv00100
Plaintiff:
David Reveles
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Hyde v. Berryhill
as 2:2018cv01259
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
David J Hyde
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Marks v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2016cv03034
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
David T. Marks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hazel v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv00344
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
David Lee Hazel
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
David Kocher vs Carolyn W. Colvin
as 3:2016cv00340
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
David Kocher
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Baumgartner v. Colvin
as 2:2015cv01912
Plaintiff:
David I. Baumgartner
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hernandez v. Colvin
as 3:2015cv00137
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
David F Hernandez
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Kocher v. Colvin
as 3:2014cv00608
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
David Kocher
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Arteaga v. Colvin
as 2:2014cv01729
Plaintiff:
David Arteaga
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
