Cases 11 - 20 of 68
Gregory v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv05202
Plaintiff:
Jamil K Gregory
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Gregoris v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2022cv00696
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Gregoris
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Degraff v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00313
Plaintiff:
Gregory Degraff
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jaeger v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00231
Plaintiff:
Gregory Matthew Jaeger
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Martinez v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv01393
Plaintiff:
Gregory A. Martinez and Gregory Martinez
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Earley v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00106
Plaintiff:
Gregory William Earley
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Guzek v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv01280
Plaintiff:
Gregory George Guzek
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Cichon v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv01098
Plaintiff:
Gregory Paul Cichon
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Gregory v. Kijakazi
as 3:2021cv01081
Plaintiff:
Amy Gregory
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Nelson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00389
Plaintiff:
Gregory Nelson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
