Cases 11 - 20 of 62
Ham v. Social Security
as 1:2022cv01285
Plaintiff:
Garry Scott Ham
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv01081
Plaintiff:
Joseph Scott Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Weger v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv00879
Plaintiff:
Scott A. Weger
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Scott v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv01742
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Scott
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Weidell v. Saul
as 1:2021cv02663
Plaintiff:
Scott D. Weidell
Defendant:
Commissioner Andrew M. Saul and Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Runquist v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2021cv04016
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Scott C Runquist
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Scott v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv03027
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth A Scott
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Arnold v. Social Security
as 3:2020cv03344
Plaintiff:
Christian Scott Arnold
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Onsen v. Saul
as 1:2020cv07284
Defendant:
Andrew Marshall Saul
Plaintiff:
Scott Onsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Perry v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2020cv02328
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Scott Perry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
