Cases 21 - 30 of 49
McDaniel v. Astrue et al
as 1:2008cv01004
Plaintiff:
Douglas McDaniel
Defendant:
Michael Astrue, Michael Mukasey and David Kustoff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Threet v. Astrue et al
as 1:2007cv01224
Plaintiff:
Roger Threet
Defendant:
Michael Astrue, David Kustoff and Michael Mukasey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Corbitt v. Astrue et al
as 1:2007cv01217
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Corbitt
Defendant:
Michael Astrue, Michael Mukasey and David Kustoff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Reetz v. Astrue et al
as 1:2007cv01211
Plaintiff:
Joan M. Reetz
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue, David Kustoff and Michael Mukasey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lafoy v. Astrue et al
as 1:2007cv01212
Plaintiff:
Billy J. Lafoy, Billy J. Lafoy and Billy J. Lafoy
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue, David Kustoff and Michael Mukasey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Odom v. Astrue et al
as 1:2007cv01190
Plaintiff:
Grover G. Odom, Jr.
Defendant:
Michael Astrue, Peter D. Keisler and David Kustoff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Morgan v. Astrue et al
as 1:2007cv01188
Plaintiff:
Michael Morgan
Defendant:
Michael Astrue, Peter D. Keisler and David Kustoff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Calberer v. Astrue et al
as 1:2007cv01178
Plaintiff:
Carla Calberer
Defendant:
Michael Astrue, Peter D. Keisler and David Kustoff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hall v. Astrue et al
as 1:2007cv01162
Plaintiff:
Valerie J. Hall
Defendant:
Michael Astrue, David Kustoff and Alberto Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Cheairs v. Astrue et al
as 1:2007cv01164
Plaintiff:
Bobby Jo Cheairs
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue, David Kustoff and Peter D. Keisler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
