Cases 21 - 30 of 83
Garcia v. Berryhill
as 4:2017cv00037
Plaintiff:
Gustavo Garcia
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Flores v. Colvin
as 4:2017cv00030
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Garcia Flores
Defendant:
Carolyn Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Garcia v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv00458
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Juana Ivonne Garcia
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Geske Garcia v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv00158
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
Teresa Margaret Geske Garcia
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Garcia v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv00145
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Santos Garcia
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Garcia v. Colvin
as 7:2016cv00119
Plaintiff:
Rogelio Aleman Garcia
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Garcia v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv00716
Plaintiff:
Andrea Ginera Garcia
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Garcia v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv00076
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Jose Jesus Garcia
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Garcia v. Colvin
as 3:2015cv00407
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Francisco Garcia
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Garcia v. Colvin
as 3:2015cv00246
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Mahra Magdalena Garcia
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
