Cases 21 - 30 of 177
Harris v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2021cv02107
Plaintiff:
Aymie Lynne Harris
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Harley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2021cv02670
Plaintiff:
Lynn Harley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Gardner v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2021cv01405
Plaintiff:
Laura Lynn Gardner
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Gonzalez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2021cv00877
Interested Party:
SSA
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Tracy Lynn Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Roberts v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2021cv00508
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Victoria Lynn Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Stout v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2021cv00164
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Jamie Lynn Stout
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2020cv02248
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Brandie Lynn Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Fatone v. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security
as 0:2020cv62260
Plaintiff:
Chad Paul Lynn Fatone
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205
Tibbetts v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2020cv00872
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Lynn Tibbetts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Arniotis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2020cv00835
Plaintiff:
Sherry Lynn Arniotis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
