Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Martin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2009cv00249
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Walter R. Martin
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Martin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2009at00105
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Walter R. Martin
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Walters v. Commisioner of Social Security
as 1:2009at00034
Plaintiff:
Joyce E Walters
Defendant:
Commisioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Joyce E. Walters v. Commisioner of Social Security
as 1:2009cv00077
Plaintiff:
Joyce E Walters
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Walter Smith v. Michael J Astrue
as 2:2007cv06470
Plaintiff:
Walter Smith
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue and Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Alfred Walters v. Michael J Astrue
as 2:2007cv04532
Plaintiff:
Alfred Walters
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue and Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Walter A. Parker III v. Michael J. Astrue
as 5:2007cv00715
Plaintiff:
Walter A Parker, III
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue and Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
John Walter Perkins III v. Michael J Astrue
as 2:2007cv03474
Plaintiff:
John Walter Perkins, III
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue and Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Walter Thomas v. Michael J Astrue
as 2:2007cv02905
Plaintiff:
Walter Thomas
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue and Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Walter W. Rogers v. Michael J. Astrue
as 5:2007cv00315
Plaintiff:
Walter W Rogers
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue and Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
