Cases 61 - 70 of 2,163
Ramirez Jr. v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv00498
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Alvino Ramirez Jr.
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Noack v. Astrue
as 6:2012cv00342
Defendant:
Cmr. Social Security Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Noack
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Mendoza v. Astrue
as 4:2012cv03661
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Michelle Mendoza
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
FILING ERROR
as 6:2012cv00341
Defendant:
Cmr. Social Security Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Noack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Pearce v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv05128
Plaintiff:
Marc Robert Pearce
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Krippendorf v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv00363
Plaintiff:
Katrina Krippendorf
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Kay v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv00259
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Plaintiff:
Henry Robert Kay, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Valle v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv00492
Defendant:
Cmr. Social Security Michael J. Astrue
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Valle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Dominguez v. Astrue
as 4:2012cv03606
Plaintiff:
Gloria Marina Dominguez
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Johnson v. Astrue
as 6:2012cv00333
Defendant:
Cmr. Social Security Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Glenn Johnson
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
