Cases 61 - 70 of 867
VOIGTSBERGER v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv02432
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
ANNE EGAN VOIGTSBERGER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
WALLS v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv02437
Plaintiff:
KEITH EUGENE WALLS
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
KULIK v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv02344
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
DAVID A KULIK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
JENNINGS v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv01953
Plaintiff:
TARRELLE RONALD THOMAS and ANNETTE JENNINGS
Defendant:
Commissioner ANDREW M. SAUL and ANDREW M. SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
LAPENTA v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv01622
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
LORI LYNN LAPENTA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
RICHBURG v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv01957
Plaintiff:
CHARLENE RICHBURG
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
Commissioner ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
CHRISTOFFERSON et al v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2020cv01497
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE D. CHRISTOFFERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
LATHAM v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv00710
Plaintiff:
JOHN ANTHONY LATHAM, JR.
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
KICHLINE v. SAUL
as 5:2020cv02151
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
TASHA KICHLINE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
VADEN v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv01626
Plaintiff:
BRANDI VADEN
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
