Cases 1 - 10 of 324
(SS) Dawson v Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024at00696
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Jaime S. Dawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
(SS) Dawson v Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv02407
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Jaime S. Dawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Stiles v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024at01101
Plaintiff:
Darren S. Stiles
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
(SS)Stiles v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv02319
Plaintiff:
Darren S. Stiles
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Cochran v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv01251
Plaintiff:
Jeaneth S. Cochran
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision (regarding payment of benefits)
Correia v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv04264
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Plaintiff:
Benjamin S. Correia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hazel Primous PR firm LLC v. Gail S Ennis et al
as 2:2024cv05252
Defendant:
Roberta, Lucy Lang, Yolanda Benetiz and others
Plaintiff:
Hazel Primous PR firm LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Danielle S. White v. Andrew Saul
as 2:2024cv04393
Plaintiff:
Danielle S. White
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Fabian v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv01589
Plaintiff:
Emil S. Fabian
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Bonnie S. Reinhardt v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00899
Plaintiff:
Bonnie S Reinhardt
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
