Cases 1 - 10 of 471
Hickman v. Preston et al
as 3:2024cv01374
Plaintiff:
Jabar Hickman
Defendant:
Kathryn Preston, Wanda C. E. Beanmon and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Edward E. Stevens v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00765
Plaintiff:
Edward E. Stevens
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Carlos E. Paz, Jr. v. Martin O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00512
Plaintiff:
Carlos E Paz, Jr.
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Marie E. Gomez v. Martin O'Malley
as 2:2023cv10814
Plaintiff:
Marie E Gomez
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
(SS) Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv02991
Plaintiff:
Paul E. Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Williams v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv05671
Plaintiff:
Mona E. Williams
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Jesus E. Sepulveda v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv08688
Plaintiff:
Jesus E. Sepulveda
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ralph E. Jones, III v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv01250
Plaintiff:
Ralph E. Jones, III
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Shane v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023at00544
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Shane
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
(SS) Shane v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv01105
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Shane
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
