Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Kretchmar v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 6:2022cv01249
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Kretchmar
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of and Attorney General of United States
Interested Party:
Social Security Regional Administrator and Regional Chief Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Brozek v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 6:2021cv01162
Plaintiff:
Rodney L Brozek and Rodney L. Brozek
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of, US Attorney General and US Attorney, Kansas
Interested Party:
Social Security Regional Administrator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Mitchell v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 2:2021cv02063
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of, US Attorney Kansas and US Attorney General
Plaintiff:
Lindsay Mitchell
Interested Party:
Social Security Regional Administrator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Edgmon v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 6:2016cv01334
Plaintiff:
Mindy Edgmon
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of and U.S. Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hansel v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 6:2016cv01181
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Ann Hansel
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of and U.S. Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Koehn v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 6:2013cv01155
Plaintiff:
Thomas Koehn
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of, United States Attorney District of Kansas and US Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Thompson v. U.S. Attorney General
as 6:2007cv01036
Plaintiff:
Sterling Thompson
Defendant:
United States Attorney General, The, Federal Commissioner and Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
