Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Taylor v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv01091
Plaintiff:
Barbara K Taylor
Defendant:
Comm'r of Soc. Martin J. O'Malley and Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Harmann v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022cv02098
Plaintiff:
Barbara J Harmann
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Taylor v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv01065
Plaintiff:
Barbara K Taylor
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Reid v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv03097
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Barbara Hazel Reid
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Matheson v. Saul
as 3:2021cv50088
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Barbara Matheson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Johnsen v. Saul
as 1:2021cv00769
Plaintiff:
Barbara A. Johnsen
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Wagner v. Saul
as 1:2020cv04903
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Barbara Alice Wagner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Book v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00547
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Barbara J. Book
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Banks-Nichols v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv00009
Plaintiff:
Barbara Banks-Nichols
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Johnson v. Saul
as 1:2019cv02062
Plaintiff:
Barbara Johnson
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill and Andrew Marshall Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
