Cases 1 - 10 of 450
David Samuel Dresnick v. Martin O Malley
as 8:2024cv01092
Plaintiff:
David Samuel Dresnick
Defendant:
Martin O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
David Duk Kim v. Martin OMalley
as 2:2024cv03889
Plaintiff:
David Duk Son Kim
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Velasco v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
David Thomas Velasco
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision (regarding payment of benefits)
David Kotaro Nishizawa v. Martin O'Malley
as 2:2024cv03575
Plaintiff:
David Kotaro Nishizawa
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
(SS) Lamar v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00504
Plaintiff:
Jacob David Lamar
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Lamar v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024at00349
Plaintiff:
Jacob David Lamar
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
David Mad Lujan v. Martin OMalley
as 5:2024cv00697
Plaintiff:
David Mad Lujan
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley and Martin OMalley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Yorke v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00895
Plaintiff:
David Yorke
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
DeVillez v. Martin O'Malley
as 3:2024cv01075
Plaintiff:
David W. DeVillez
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Martin O'Malley and Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Snyder v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv02288
Plaintiff:
David Eric Snyder
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0402 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
