Cases 1 - 10 of 229
Barnett v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv02141
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Barnett
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Martin v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv02428
Plaintiff:
Dawn Elizabeth Martin
Defendant:
Comm'r of Soc. Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Elizabeth Dorantes Lacey v. Martin O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Dorantes Lacey
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
(SS) Lopez Roche v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Marcela Elizabeth Lopez Roche
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
(SS) Rudolph v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv02765
Plaintiff:
Ashley Elizabeth Rudolph
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Deborah Elizabeth Barrett v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv10463
Plaintiff:
Deborah Elizabeth Barrett
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Harris v. Kijakazi
as 3:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Marian Elizabeth Harris
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 id Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Moran v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv02182
Plaintiff:
Samantha Jane Elizabeth Moran
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 wc Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
(SS) Desylva v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv01661
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Desylva
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Montevaldo v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv06260
Plaintiff:
Shanti Elizabeth Montevaldo
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
