Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Duda v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00438
Plaintiff:
Justine Lee Duda
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Varon v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2023cv00526
Plaintiff:
Amanda Lee Varon
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Lee v. Social Security
as 2:2023cv00326
Plaintiff:
Shauntelle Marie Lee
Defendant:
Commissioner Of Social Security and SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Johnson v. Social Security
as 2:2021cv01997
Plaintiff:
Kenny Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Commissioner Of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Johnson v. Commissioner of the Social Security
as 2:2021cv01993
Plaintiff:
Nichole Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Lee v. Kijakazi
as 2:2021cv01569
Plaintiff:
William Dale Lee
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Martinez v. Saul
as 2:2021cv01129
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Lee v. Berryhill
as 2:2019cv00076
Plaintiff:
Hyon Suk Lee
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Grant v. Nancy A. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv00065
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin, Nancy A. Berryhill and Caroline W Colvin
Plaintiff:
Grant and Tracey Lee Grant
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Fink v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2016cv02398
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Fink
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
