Cases 1 - 10 of 427
King v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Billy James King
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Claiborne v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Kenneth J. Claiborne
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
General Counsel SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Washington v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
John Washington
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Scott v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Shira Scott
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Patrick v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
as 3:2023cv00548
Plaintiff:
Schnitta Schnette Patrick
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Darren J. LaMarca
Interested Party:
General Counsel SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Ethridge v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv00198
Plaintiff:
Johnathan J. Ethridge
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Dee v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2021cv00174
Plaintiff:
Charles J. Dee
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Brown-Summers v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2021cv00699
Plaintiff:
Barbara J. Brown-Summers
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Matthews v. Saul
as 3:2021cv00154
Plaintiff:
Pennie J. Matthews
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Moore v. Berryhill
as 4:2018cv00255
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Connie J. Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
