Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Manning v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jay Manning
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Dubie v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2023cv00547
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dubie
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only) and SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Collazo-Reyes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2023cv01651
Plaintiff:
Kevin Collazo-Reyes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
NORMAN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2022cv00334
Plaintiff:
KEVIN NORMAN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Cameron v. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2021cv01299
Plaintiff:
Kevin Michael Cameron
Interested Party:
SSA
Defendant:
Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Herring v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2021cv00322
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Kevin Kashon Herring
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Manning v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2021cv00288
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jay Manning
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Carr v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2021cv00056
Plaintiff:
Kevin Carr
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
WALKER v. SAUL
as 3:2020cv05959
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
KEVIN E WALKER and KEVIN EUGENE WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
BURNS v. SAUL
as 4:2020cv00541
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
KEVIN BURNS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
