Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Lamar v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2022cv01060
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lamar
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Wilson v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2022cv00789
Plaintiff:
Jontea Lamar Wilson
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Erkard v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2021cv05281
Plaintiff:
Lamar Erkard
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
HUGHES v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2021cv00428
Plaintiff:
STEVE LAMAR HUGHES
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Not Classified By Court:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
CARTER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 4:2021cv00079
Not Classified By Court:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (NOTICE)
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff:
GERALD LAMAR CARTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Lamar v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv01211
Plaintiff:
Angela Lamar
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hambrick v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2018cv02843
Plaintiff:
Lamar Hambrick
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
McDonald v. Berryhill
as 4:2017cv00126
Plaintiff:
Wendall Lamar McDonald
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
McCluskey v. Berryhill
as 4:2017cv00019
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lamar McCluskey
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill and Social Security Regional Administrator - NEF Only
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Roberts v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2017cv00014
Plaintiff:
William Lamar Roberts
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
